If you know anything about Thermomixes, you'll know that the TM5 model came after the TM31 model, which had an unfortunate tendency to explode while mixing hot liquids. You'd be standing there waiting for your semi-automated mushroom risotto to finish cooking, and end up in a burns unit, scalded so badly it took weeks to recover.
Hot wet rice sending people to hospital was not a good brand story, but ThermomixTM survived that PR disaster, thanks in large part to its extraordinarily loyal customer base: as anyone who owns a Thermomix will tell you, a Thermomix is not just a kitchen appliance. It's not even just a German-engineered, ergonomically designed, multi-purpose blender with a 500W motor and top-quality stainless steel blades that spin at 10,000 RPM (the same speed as turbines in a jet engine, if you're wondering).
Guys. Please. It's so much more than that! A Thermomix is a way of life. It's an online recipe subscription service, a passionate homemaker community, and a comprehensive cooking philosophy with a small but highly-dedicated following of people who will evangelise about the life-changing impact of their premium pulveriser to anyone who will listen.
Wait. Is it... am I in... is this a cult? What makes a cult a "cult" anyway? A community of people getting a bit intense about something? That seems unfair. Or it is only when that passion turns toxic that the 'c'-word ought apply? This is an inherently tricky area, the proximity to organised religion and political movements make it hard to pin something down as a cult. There's not even an agreed-upon legal definition for the word 'cult' – we identify them through vibes, basically. There are a few common characteristics – a charismatic leader, emotional and psychological manipulation of members, excessive and irrational devotion to the group's teachings, and isolation from mainstream society. (But here's the issue: using that logic, we could also be describing a spin class!)









